Katy Perry is Out For Revenge


Don't listen to this nonsense:
Pop tart Katy Perry left little to the imagination in a sheer ensemble while out and about in Paris on Thursday. While we adore her coral-colored Jimmy Choo handbag and strappy Christian Louboutin sandals, we abhor her tired blue tresses and minty Vera Wang mess of a dress. Oh, and those granny panties ... they belong under sweatpants, not on display during Fashion Week!
Katy Perry is out for revenge. That's a classically-oriented revenge outfit, right down to the shoes. She isn't wearing that to impress the public. She's wearing that to get back at everyone who ever dumped her or divorced her.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Illegal Buttocks Injections Are All the Rage


This is the woman known as "Black Madam" who has, allegedly, been illegally injecting silicone into the rear ends of people. Philadelphia police have finally caught up to her. Last year, a woman died as a result of this "procedure."

It's sad that there is a racial component, an ignorance component, and a desperate desire to be famous component to all of this. And, I think the one that stands out is the money component. Greed will make you do crazy things.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Lady Gaga Creates a Harvard Foundation


Lady Gaga could be using her money to buy weird things that only she would ignore and never use. Instead, she's creating foundations and, a very small level, trying to change the world.

This woman is going to have multiple acts throughout American popular culture.

Always Good For a Tepid Laugh


I'm sure that the Academy Awards is thrilled to know that Sacha Baron Cohen was able to flog his worthless film for a few minutes on their dime by going with a lame, easily anticipated joke.

When did mediocrity demand an airing and why are we forced to see this sort of thing over and over again? Cohen practically had a meltdown in public when they wouldn't let him pull his seen-it-coming-from-a-mile-away prank and this is the best he could come up with? Bimbos, a fake beard, and crap dumped on Ryan Seacrest?

I just can't understand why anyone tolerates this stuff anymore. This is why they give money to Adam Sandler to make movies--there's no one willing to tell the people who hand out the bucks that this stuff is over and done with.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sacha Baron Cohen Cries and Gets His Way


Hollywood loves a shill, and that's all Sacha Baron Cohen aspires to be.
He has to shill his new movie on the red carpet and try to drum up as much interest as possible. If it flops like Bruno, he knows he won't get to make too many more of these films and he'll be relegated to playing "the foreign weirdo" for the next thirty years.
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Nasty Business of Lawyers


That's actually a great way to deflect blame. When Sugarland's lawyer says "voluntarily assumed risk," that's exactly how they're going to get away with turning back all of the lawsuits that have been filed.

It all comes down to planning. Who planned out the construction of the stage and the lighting equipment? Who specified that the overhanging stage portion would have lights and would thus be "appropriate" for the venue, the artist, and for the shows that were planned?

Given that this was probably going to be a shared stage with numerous acts, someone had to have produced a document or a plan that specified that the artists would be presented on a stage with x number of lights, y number of overhead sound speakers, and z number of scaffolding pieces upon which to either attach or secure that equipment. There are also considerations for video equipment and how many operators would be utilized in that overhang as part of each show. Each band would either provide overhead lighting technicians or would use the venue's technicians for the duration of the various shows that were scheduled to take place and so there had to be a schedule or an agreement as to how all of that would be organized and run. Finally, the panels that screened or covered up that equipment as it faced the audience no doubt carried corporate logos or advertising, perhaps even video screens.

Whoever ordered the lights, speakers, video equipment, corporate logos and flat-front panels is liable. Whoever specified how that equipment would be used and for there to be roadies in that collapsed overhang is to blame. And this is for the entire duration of the production, since it could have been equipment installed by another act that actually made the overhang heavy and/or susceptible to collapse.

But people tend to go after whoever has deep pockets and hope for a settlement. This was a planning and safety failure. It should never have happened, but there it is.

So much for all of that sympathy and for all of those prayers. Lawyers don't much care if you prayed for the injured and the dead. They want their money and they're going to find a way to get their money.
Enhanced by Zemanta